User:Jakeparvin/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cop_City

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it is a topic I am interested in. It is also a topic that is currently evolving, which had an impact on my decision.

Evaluate the article
The article clearly states the project's goals and the appropriate information associated with it. It is concise, it provides the necessary details objectively. The content is thorough. It describes different points of view from different perspectives. It also backs up this information using relevant sources. With that said, more information about the corporate donors could be added to the article. This is relevant to the project; it will provide the reader with a more thorough understanding of the power structure behind the project. This insight would also allow the reader to extrapolate the interests of the city and the reason behind the city's continual denial of input from the citizens of Atlanta. The AFSC has an extensive list of corporate donors, sponsors and foundations that support the project. The Guardian also has an article discussing some of the same investors. Regardless, the tone of the article is objective. It gives a clear summary of the events that have occurred and is well organized. The page displays clear and relevant images with clear captions as well. In the talks page there are disputes about whether cop city should be used as the article's name because it is more commonly used. Eventually the article was changed to be named cop city. The article is extremely clear and does an excellent job of keeping an objective tone while relating the relevant event.