User:Jakes27s/sandbox

= Creeping Normality =

Content

 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Are some areas under or over developed?
 * Is any information out of date?
 * Is anything missing that could be added?
 * What else could be improved?

Yes, the content is relevant. However, it is very sparse, and there are only three citations. There needs to be more added for this article to be helpful. The idea was introduced through environmental degradation, that could be developed further. It is also referred to as Death by a Thousand Cuts, and that needs development. Also, other sources have used that term to include maternal obesity, as well as government interference. The page was under consideration to be deleted in 2005 but was voted on to be kept. A small amount of work was done at that time, but the last time the subject was reviewed was in 2015.

Also, under Jared Diamond's page, there is no link to creeping normality. I am not sure if that is within my scope, but I would like to add that link to his page.

Tone

 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

The article is neutral and does not appear to contain an author's bias. However, it is written in a negative tone, and it would be interesting to see if there are any instances of this occurring in a positive light.

Work in Progress
The talk page shows that this article is within the scope of psychology, sociology, and future studies. It was nominated for deletion in 2005, but ultimately voted on to keep. I still question as to whether it needs to exist or if it is a derivation of the page on "death by a thousand cuts". I hope to develop the topic so it warrants its own page.