User:Jakob Suckale/talk archive 10-13

File permission problem with File:Institute finished.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Institute finished.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. JDavid (talk) 14:10, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:2005Nov TR3 wikipedia files.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2005Nov TR3 wikipedia files.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Acather96 (talk) 14:53, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lyxor Asset Management


A tag has been placed on Lyxor Asset Management requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. SummerPhD (talk) 14:49, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lyxor logo.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Lyxor logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:04, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed Image Deletion
A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:55, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Request for use of Suckale08 fig3 glucose insulin day.jpg
Hi Jakob. Thank you so much for all that you have contributed to Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Commons! I found your image Suckale08 fig3 glucose insulin day.jpg on the blood glucose article particularly helpful. I've incorporated a small piece of a modified version of it into a one-page document to be used in health screenings in underserved communities. (A png of a draft can be found [here http://dl.dropbox.com/u/652502/draft%201.png]) Given the nature of the work, I would like to make it available for use with the absolute minimum number of restrictions possible by releasing it into the public domain. I think my version of the graph is different enough that that would be a fair use, but I thought I would see how you felt about it and ask for your blessing. Obviously, I will credit you myself wherever possible, but I don't want to give anyone who might use the sheet for some public health work to have the slightest legal concern. Thanks again for all your contributions! mcs (talk) 04:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi mcs, I couldn't view the file you created. But I'm fine with what you want to do. I typically chose CC-by-sa since I think the origin of the work should be traceable to check the science behind. I would love to hear why you think CC0 is more suitable. Do you have real life examples where CC-by-sa caused problems. --— J.S.talk 10:42, 23 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi Jakob. Thanks for your response. Sorry about the bad link. The file is now available here. I don't have a real-life example of CC-BY-SA being a problem; I just want to encourage (re)use as much as possible, so I wanted to err on the side of not spooking people with any copyright issues at all. On the other hand, I definitely see your point about tracing the science, so the image page includes complete attribution, and I might go ahead and put a URL directly in the image in case someone decides they really want to verify the sources. Thanks again, and definitely let me know if you're still ok with the licensing. mcs (talk) 17:01, 23 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi mcs. I had a look at the diagram you made. Very nice work. By all means, go ahead with CC0. --— J.S.talk 18:58, 28 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you! We'll be using the form at screenings this year, and your contribution will be extremely helpful in explaining what the results mean and hopefully improving some people's health. mcs (talk) 19:43, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion
One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:00, 28 November 2011 (UTC).

Orphaned non-free image File:ELSO logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:ELSO logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:17, 6 April 2012 (UTC)