User:Jakubm1998/Restoule v Canada/Sofia.ali29 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? AmadineB, Jakubm1998, SMTM98, Sajmal19
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Here

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes!
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes - lots from 2018, recent.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I don't believe so
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? YES

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, no notable presence of bias
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, only inform.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, Reliable sources - also linked often ( would add more to the 'background' section however)
 * Are the sources current? Yes! Many from 2018
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Many are from the same site.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes they do

Organization
- I like the choices for Subheadings and how it is organized!

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * I thought this article was great, concise and accurate. One suggestion I would make would be to expand on the definition of "annuity payments" as having an undefined term in the first sentence can be off-putting to non-experts. I would also suggest linking a source to the Anishnebe specifically, not just the broad term of First Nations peoples. Overall, great article though, I enjoyed reading it!