User:Jalengrable/Jimmy Van Alen/Lborchardt2003 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jalengrable


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Jimmy Van Alen


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The Lead is direct and straight to the point. It does not go on for too long, and it lists what Jimmy Van Allen is most notable for. The content seems to be up to date because there is information retrieved that is from 2022. There aren't any claims that are made that seem opinionated throughout the article, although there is not a whole lot of content in the article to begin with.The sources at the bottom of the article look to be current for the most part as a few of them are from 2015, and one from 2022 especially for someone who died in the 90s. The content is clear and concise, and it is easy to read and not too bulky. The article could definitely use some images in it as there is only one, and it isn't even of the guy the article is about. I would say that there could be slightly more information added to make it more complete.