User:Jalfield/Lisa Nakamura/Meklite16 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jalfield


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jalfield/Lisa_Nakamura?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Lisa Nakamura

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead- The lead does not seem to be updated

Content- The added content is relevant to the topic. It has updated the page on when Lisa Nakamura published her wrote her article and there is some background about her article and why it was written.

Tone and Balance- The added content is very neutral. There are no points that seem biased in anyway.

Sources and Balances- The sources are updated and reliable. There are no .com websites anywhere in sight. The sources are also referenced nicely.

Organization- The content added is written in their respective sections and they are organized in a way that is easy to understand what they added to the page.

Overall impressions:

Overall, the added content is useful to the article. Also, this editor's content did get added to the actual wikipedia page which is great and also shows that the content added was helpful to the page. An improvement to these edits is maybe an image could have been added to add something different than just writing.