User:Jalyn547/Pain scale/Nicolemicha Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Jaylyn 547


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jalyn547/Pain_scale/Nicolemicha_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Pain scale

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: I do not see the lead being updated to reflect the new content added by my peer. I see the paragraph of new information and believe a lead could come from that information.

Content: The content that is added is relevant to the topic and features more background information about pain, which ties into pain scales. The content is also up to date as it talks about pain in an objective manner. I do believe some content is missing since I only see one paragraph added so far. I could assume more information will be added as our assignments of Wikipedia editing continues.

Tone and Balance: The information that is added does have a neutral tone and there aren't any claims that are biased towards a perspective on pain. The tone of the paragraph is simply stating the experience of pain in a universal and broad way. When thinking about overrepresented or underrepresented viewpoints, I believe there aren't enough viewpoints yet to determine this. Perhaps some more information will allow for a dissection of the quality of representation. However, the content added does not attempt to persuade the reader to favor one position or the other. The information is neutral and features a definition that applies universally.

Sources and Information: I do not see a reference section, therefore, I would assume the new content has a reference, just not put in yet. To determine if the sources are thorough, current, written in a diverse spectrum of authors, or reflected in the article, I believe they would need to be added.

Organization: The content was concise and clear and easy to read, and I did not see any grammatical errors. To determine if all the information to be added was organized well, I would suggest to add more.

Images and Media: I do not see any added images or media

Overall Impressions: I believe the information added to the article is a great place to start when editing the article. I suggest for more information to be added and organized as well as more sources backing up the edits on the article. A strength from the article would be its neutral standpoint and I believe more improvement could be made through adding more information.