User:JamesKellerWhite/sandbox

Evaluating Content
Everything written in the article seems relevant to the topic. Some information may be out of date, as three of the four sources are from 2013. The article does link to other articles with related information. The article could be improved by adding more information. The article mentions some key events that occured during this time period, but it does not provide any additional details. It could be improved by elaborating more. The article contains pictures, but they are poorly organized and not next to the information they are related to. Currently, the article is only one paragraph and one sentence, it could be divided into sections as more information is added.

Evaluating Tone
The article has a neutral tone, and it does not seem biased at all.

Evaluating Sources
The sources could definitely be improved upon. Sources 2 and 4 are both news articles meant for entertainment, not scientific journals that will accurately portray information. The link for source 2 is broken, but it can be found with a google search. The article is not well cited; most of the facts given do not reference a specific source. Source 1 is not referenced at all in the article. Sources 1 and 3 are both journal articles from peer-reviewed journals, so they should provide more accurate information.

Evaluating Talk Page
There is no discussion taking place on the article's talk page. The last post is an unanswered question from 2015, and the only thing written before that is from 2009. The article is rated as a stub class and mid importance. It is part of Wikiproject Geology.