User:Jameshu1/Husky Union Building/Mikin83 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jameshu1


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jameshu1/Husky_Union_Building?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Husky Union Building

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - Seems like it's same, but my peer added details as a draft below the lead.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the articles's topic? - Yes, it includes more information.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? - Yes, it includes a brief description.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? - In peer's draft, yes, it includes information that is not present in the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overtly detailed? - I think it is concise.

Content

 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? - Yes, it is relevant to the topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? - Yes, it is added up-to-date.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? - It will be great if you put more detailed of what exact stores and facilities are in the HUB, like the name of the restaurant, etc.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? - I guess it deals with equity gaps.

Tone and Balance

 * Is the content added neutral? - Yes, it is written in neutral tone.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? - No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? - No.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? - No.

Source and References

 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - There's no references.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? - There's no references.
 * Are the sources through - i.e., Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? - There's no references.
 * Are the sources current? - There's no references.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? - There's no references.
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? - UW website is one of the great sources for this article.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? - There's no references.

Organization

 * Is the content added well-written? - I guess so. But there's more room to improve.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? - I didn't see any grammatical issue.
 * Is the content added well-organized? - It can be separated more sections.

Images and Media

 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? - Yes.
 * Are images well-captioned? - Yes.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? - I think so.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? - Yes.

Overall Impressions

 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article (is the article more complete?) - It is improved compared to the present article, but there's more information that can be added to the article, like I mentioned, more detailed of what exact stores and facilities are in the HUB, like the name of the restaurant, etc.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? - Definitely detailed information.
 * How can the content added be improved? - I mentioned above, more detailed of what exact stores and facilities are in the HUB, like the name of the restaurant, etc.