User:Jan10808/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Maureen Baginski

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because Maureen Baginski is a very notable female figure in the world of espionage. This article has not really been touched much since 2018, so it may need to be updated with current information.

Lead Section

 * The lead section does not contain an overview of the sections, and it only details what Baginski is notable for.
 * It is concise, but almost too concise with no supplemental information about Baginski. In comparison to other notable figures, they have more comprehensive lead sections that detail the figure's place of birth and background.

Content

 * The content is relevant but does not seem to be up to date, considering that the last substantial edit was almost four years ago.
 * Some of the content in the section entitled "Public sector career" is not very relevant to the topic of her career such as the documentary that quotes Baginski.
 * The topic does not contain anything regarding equity or underrepresented communities.

Tone and Balance

 * The tone seems fairly neutral, and no specific viewpoints are conveyed.

Sources and Reference

 * Some sentences in this article are not referenced.
 * The sources used are reputable, but not all of the links are still available.
 * While the sources are reputable, not all of them seem to have been written by a diverse spectrum of authors or even have authors listed.
 * There are better sources available, especially that are able to replace the dead links that are currently listed as references.

Organization and writing quality

 * The article is well-written and does not have many grammatical or spelling errors.
 * The organization of the article is not well-organized because some points are out of place.

Images and Media

 * Images are not included to increase the understanding of the topic and enhance the information listed.
 * The image of Baginski seems to be not copyrighted, but the image itself has no caption or give a correct source to where the image was found.

Talk page discussion

 * Not much conversation is happening on the talk page to enhance the quality of the article.
 * It is rated Start-class and is a part of WikiProject Biography, Espionage, Women, and United States.
 * It differs because not much supplemental information concerning Baginski's life is online because she is a part of the intelligence community and has not disclosed personal information.

Overall impressions

 * The article's overall status is start-class, which is fair considering that not much has been done to keep the article up-to-date.
 * The article's main strength is that the overall organization of the article is a good start.
 * The article can be improved by updating the links, providing better sources, and adding information about Baginski as it arises.
 * The article is not well-developed, but the main part of this reason is that Baginski is alive and has not disclosed much personal information about herself.