User:Janemkeller/National Domestic Workers Alliance/ErikaKuti Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Janemkeller
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * National Domestic Workers

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes the Lead has been updated tot include new content
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes the introductory sentence clearly states what type of organization the NDWA is and where they are based
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * The article does not include any other major sections
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * The lead is concise in its explanation of the NDWA

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * The content is relevant to the topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * The content is up-to-date and includes citations from 2018 and 2019.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * All of the content does belong, however there is room for a time line or further information.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Overall the content is neutral in its statement of facts and quotes except for one sentence that "thanks" NDWA's advocacy
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article itself is positive towards the NDWA and does not include any criticism or controversy.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Criticisms of the NDWA are underrepresented
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * The content may persuade the reader to not think critically of the NDWA

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes there is an an abundance of reliable citations
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes all are from 2018 or 2019
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Most of the links work

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * The content is organized well but not detailed enough to be broken down into sections

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

There are no images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary info-boxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes the content added made the article more current, however, more can be added in the future for further detail
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * The content is up to date and cited well
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * The content could be more detailed and include images such as the logo for the NDWA.

Overall evaluation
Overall, this wikipedia page was concise and current which makes it a good page to examine if curious about a brief overview of the NDWA.