User:Jarem.wylie/sandbox

The first poster is correct that, no matter how you do it, it is much more expensive to produce, compress and store hydrogen to move a car x miles than to charge a battery to move the car x miles. And, given how hydrogen is actually produced, it is far dirtier today, and not likely to be the best choice for decarbonization in the future: see this. -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:59, 22 February 2017 (UTC)"How is it produced in a dirty way? There are alternative ways to produce hydrogen and you still need resources to build and make batteries for the supply of electric cars."Elon Musk called hydrogen as "an incredibly dumb car fuel". Reference: Joe Romm at Think Progress 192.100.120.41 (talk) 06:34, 28 September 2015 (UTC)"No where on the page is there reference to Elon Musk and only one reference to Tesla under the comparison to alternative fuel types section. If he is against hydrogen powered cars there could be a section explaining why he thinks that way as he is a huge part of the increased popularity of electric cars.""The page focuses only a little bit on hydrogen cars but mostly on alternatives. There’s no information on how they actually work so a small subsection could be added to show how it works or the difference between normal combustion engines vs hydrogen combustion.""If hydrogen powered cars are so inviable how come they’re still being pursued in some way? The page in general seems very anti-hydrogen powered cars." ~