User:Jarrett Standridge/Chief Tom Blount/Molly.f.hughes Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) - Jarrett Standridge
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Jarrett Standridge/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? - Yes, however, I would consider adding this person's birth and death dates.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? - Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? - Yes, but it does not go into too much detail, which is a good thing.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? - Concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? - Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? - Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? - The content that is there is great so far. Maybe consider adding more content under the Early Life & Later Life subsections. For instance, under Early Life maybe discuss more family information and education. In the Later Life section, can you provide some specific examples of when Tuscarora and North Carolina allied against common enemies?

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? - Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? - No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? - No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? - No, the content appears to be very factual.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? - Yes
 * Are the sources current? - Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? - When I clicked on the links at the bottom of the page they sent me to blank Wikipedia pages. However, this could be my fault.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? - Heck yeah
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? - No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? - Yes

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? - No
 * Are images well-captioned? - No images
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? - No images
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? - No images

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? - Yes
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? - I found there to be an adequate amount of sources.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? - Yes, the article is structured like other similar ones.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? - No, I would recommend adding the Wikipedia links to notable names and places mentioned in the article.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? - Yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added? - The added content is very factual and informative.
 * How can the content added be improved? - Perhaps try adding more personal details if you can find them, such as any children or marriages this person had.

Overall evaluation
Overall, I found this article to be well developed and very informative. I would consider adding a little more detail in certain areas. For instance, in the second paragraph in the Tuscarora War section you might want to add the names of the key political figures that were killed if at all possible. I would also consider adding some pictures of this person and maps of the area he controlled and lived on. Great work & best of luck finishing it!