User:Jarvanc/Farewell My Concubine (film)/Wenqi Zhang Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:Jarvanc/Farewell My Concubine (film)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jarvanc/Farewell_My_Concubine_%28film%29?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Guiding questions

The lead part include some introductory sentences to concisely describe the topic of the article; meanwhile, there is a brief description of the major sections. I think the lead part is not overly detailed but in good structure.

Content

The content added is relevant to the topic and up-to-date. The part of different characters like Die Yi or Xiao Lou and other characters can become supplementary to each other. Generally, it is a well-structured work. As for the historical background of the story between Die Yi and Xiao Lou, it is a more complex content and it can give more comprehensive background to cast doubts and express feelings for the stories at that time. Furthermore, these topics related to Cultural Revolution can be further supported with more relevant articles.

Tone and balance

The content added are objective historical details and analysis and the content is neutral and some of the viewpoints about the cultural revolution are omitted and unrepresented. The article is trying to convince the readers to appreciate the film in favor showing understanding and sympathy to those people under suffering and torture from the cultural revolution and other historical influencing factors. The sources for this article are well chosen and these sources are related to the film as the review of the film and there can be other sources from both Chinese and foreign scholarly articles to form the critical views of the film. The article is supported by credible journal article and there is only one source and more articles can be found to support the idea.

Organization:

The content is well written in a more concise structure and there are several minor grammatical and spelling errors.

Images and media:

There are no images to support the content and it may lack vivid description and images for the content.

Overall impressions:

This is a well-written passage with clear and concise structure and the supporting details are proving the topics in the article. There can be more vivid pictures together with descriptions to enrich the topic and the article.