User:Jaselleee/sandbox

While you have demonstrated the technical ability to add information in your sandbox, the assignment was to evaluate an actual article on wikipedia (for tone, references used, etc...) (Liz).

= Article Evaluation = The training exercise for evaluating sources and articles was very resourceful. I learned that the first step for evaluating an article is to look at the quality rating which basically will tell you whether or not an article is reliable. Good articles have the same qualities, which is what makes them a good article such as clear structure, a balanced content, and neutral tone. Articles that aren't as reliable do not share these qualities. Those types of articles will consist of gaps in research, little to no citations, and warning banners. Learning about how to correctly site sources and to also determine if an article is reliable or not is a very important concept for editing in wikipedia. The training exercise shed light on all aspects of editing correctly.