User:Jasleend/Tonkin snub-nosed monkey/Ilk12 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jasleend


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jasleend/Tonkin_snub-nosed_monkey?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Tonkin snub-nosed monkey

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

The Lead appears to have been updated to reflect the new content added by my peer (primarily about the biology and conservation status of Tonkin snub-nosed monkeys). The Lead is very comprehensive and describes the information about the topic that is currently provided. The Lead has an optimal balance of detail and focus.

Content:

The content added is very relevant and up-to-date to the topic. Thus far, the content appropriately reflects the topic. The article currently focuses on the status of the species and doesn’t provide much information otherwise. However, my peer is working on expanding the information by creating a biology section to describe the Tonkin snub-nosed monkey. Permitting that they continue to add new topics about the species, the article will be an increasingly helpful resource.

Tone and Balance:

The content added to the article is neutral - there is no bias, overrepresentation, underrepresentation, or persuasion in the information.

Sources and References:

The new content that my peer added is backed up by reliable secondary sources of information. After referring to the sources referenced, the content appears to accurately reflect these thorough sources. Furthermore, the sources added are both current - each from within the past five years.

Organization:

The content is currently well written - it is clear and void of spelling and grammatical errors. Additionally, the article itself is structured concisely which makes it easier to read. The structure should be maintained as more sections are added.

Images and Media:

The article includes one photograph and one map that enhance the understanding of the topic - both of which are well-captioned and laid out in a visually appealing way. Adding more visual media should be taken into consideration.

Overall Impressions:

Overall, the content added has improved the quality of the article. It appears that my peer is on the right track for strengthening their article about Tonkin snub-nosed monkeys and continued development will yield a successful piece.