User:JasmineBriggins/Attitude (psychology)/Beckie19 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(JasmineBriggins)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Attitude (psychology)


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Attitude (psychology)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

All of the content was descriptive and provided a holistic background. It remained neutral during the historical portion and maintained a neutral stand point. However, it lacked in knowledge and structure. Although the article had a lot of important information it seemed to not be enough. Some sections were larger than others and there was a lot missing from important sections like the structure. This can be found through more reading and research. It could also be done by expanding upon the information we have already in the article. For example, in the knowledge section the article states only on instance where they find that "Several studies have shown that knowledge increases are associated with heightened attitudes that influence behavior". Although they state that several studies have been shown to have this conclusion, they only list one. This would mean the reader would have to rely on that one article cited or that they will have to do more research to find it. Another section I found to be lacking was the "value expressive" which is only two sentences long and provides no citations for the definition. Something that would add value and credibility would be to expand using examples that have studied this so that we can put a citation in place. Overall, a good start but the article has a lot of improvement that is needed. ~