User:Jasmineburke/Sinorhizobium meliloti/Gsloan18 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jasmine Burke


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jasmineburke/Sinorhizobium meliloti
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Sinorhizobium meliloti

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The introductory sentence was edited to include more general information about the topic. There is no description of the added sections 'Agricultural Importance' and 'Genome,' but these contain important relevant information that should be mentioned in the lead to fully convey the importance of the topic. 'Bacteriophage' section is not mentioned in lead either. The lead has been edited to be less overly-detailed, making it easier to read.

Example of model legume from original article (Medicago truncatula) omitted, however this piece of information aids in the reader's understanding of the 'Symbiosis' section. Can still take out of lead but add to later section.

Content added in the 'Symbiosis' section makes the section easier to understand. Added sections 'Agricultural Importance' and 'Genome' provide additional relevant information but should be mentioned in the lead.

In the 'Genome' section, the word genome is not made a hyperlink to its own Wiki page until the second time it appears in the article.

Entire 'Genome' section is lacking a citation.

The content added improved the overall quality of the article.

Source 3 is a bit old (2006) but still relevant. Other added sources are good, neutral, reliable sources.