User:Jasminrw/Feminine hygiene/Dreya00 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Jasminerw
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Jasminrw/Feminine hygiene

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
I think the lead for this article was concise and well written, however I do not see the content that differs from the original article (the original content was not included to provide contrast) I do believe that the lead has all other aspects of the proper information needed

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
I do believe the content provided is relevant and up to date. I do believe that there could be the addition of a menstrual disc into menstrual products ( see Flex or Softdisc)

I did not see any content that I believe was irrelevant to the topics, I would like to possibly see pictures added to the article of the different varieties of products.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
After reading the article, I definitely think the information provided is not biased at all. I think the representation will be improved as more content gets added. I do not believe there are any elements of persuasion here in this article ( which I think is excellent because any woman reading this should not and I believe would not feel any pressure to choose a specific product out of the options mentioned. I think possibly including organic options as a subsection of the mentioned products, also including the different sizes and materials used in each product. I think the main issue right now is the article is incomplete and does not really have notes on what additions are being planned

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
Yes, all content is backed up and the links I tried work. The ones I checked are relevant to the article and do provide information regarding the products mentioned in the revisions. I think there are more articles and sources that could be used in this article regarding different types of menstrual product such as menstrual discs. All the articles I looked at appeared current and updated.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
So far I do believe the content is well organized. When there is more information added I do believe it will be concise and easy to read. From what I read I did not see any major errors in the grammar or spelling department. I do not know specifically what content is new but I do believe the page is coming together nicely.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
N/A

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

New Article Evaluation
N/A

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
I think for the content added to this article to be more complete I would have to see the article in a more final stage of writing. I think for a draft I would like to see more notes to see what the progression of the piece is set out to look like. I think adding the different menstrual products was great, and I am excited that more options are being provided for women. I would really like to see images and descriptions on the different types and variations of menstrual products ( sizes, prices, materials.) Overall I thibk this article was an awesome choice and I look forward to seeing the final product of your edits and revisions to this article!