User:Javenemani/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Blue poison dart frog
 * I chose this article to evaluate, because after reading through the article and viewing a picture of the species, it seemed very interesting to read more about.

Lead

 * The leading sentence of the article clearly introduces the Blue poison dart frog. It mentions the scientific name for the species, as well as where it was derived.
 * The lead includes the contents that can be found within the article.


 * Everything that is mentioned in the lead, is also mentioned and explained throughout the article.
 * The lead is very concise and straightforward. It explains the meaning behind the species scientific name as well as the original place where the species derived.

Content

 * Everything in the article is relevant to the topic.
 * The content in the article is up-to-date. The article was lasted edited June 16, 2020.
 * I do not see any missing or irrelevant information in the article.
 * The Blue Poison Dart Frog is considered to be a threatened species.

Tone and Balance

 * This article is very neutral. There is no one side being picked over the other.

Sources and References

 * The writer(s) of this article provided 3 reference sources.
 * Both sources are reliable and reflect the topic of the article.
 * one source was written in 2010 and the other in 2006.
 * After clicking on a few link, all links were verified and they worked.

Organization

 * The article is very easy to read and well-written.
 * I did not come across any grammatical or spelling errors.
 * The article is well organized and is broken up into content sections.

Images and Media

 * The article includes several pictures of the Blue Poison Dart Frog.
 * Each image is well-captioned.
 * All images adhere to Wikipedias copyright regulations.
 * All of the images are laid out in a visually appealing way. They are not all on top of each other; they are well spaced out.

Checking the talk page

 * The main conversation going on in the talk page is where the poison toxin was derived, and whether or not the toxin came from an insect.
 * The article was rated as a C-class article on the quality scale and low-importance on the importance scale. This article is apart of the Amphibians and reptile wikiproject.

Overall impressions

 * Overall, the article is very well-written and strong in every area. I didn't come across any errors or irrelevant information.

Optional activity

 * I left a feedback on the talk page regarding how the Blue Poison Dart Frog gets its toxins.


 * Talk:Blue poison dart frog