User:Jawad.hajyounes/Decision-making/F40000 Peer Review

General info
Jawad.hajyounes
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jawad.hajyounes/Decision-making?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Decision-making

Evaluate the drafted changes
CONTENT:

-  the content added was relevant to the topic. Al in today's world is growing rapidly and affect many avenues including decision-making, so Jawad picked a good and relevant topic to talk about.

- The content is up to date (>2022)

- None of the content is missing. But one thing I will say is AI is a rapidly growing topic and in the future, Jawad’s subsection may need to be developed based on any future AI advancements.

TONE AND BALANCE:

- the content added was neutral.

- none of the claims appear heavily biased towards a particular position.

- the content added does not persuade the reader however, what Jawad needs to watch out for is some of the words he used have specific connotations. Even though he might sound neutral, some of the words may be interperted in a different way depending on the reader’s prejudices and opinions before reading jawads article.

SOURCES AND REFRENCES:

- all the sources are new (>2022)

- all the sources are live and functioning.

- all the sources are thorough.

- none of the sources are primary.

- only one source was in the 90’s but Jawad used the source for his introduction. The introduction does not dive in deep and affect the main body of his subsections. It is a book specifically,.

- all the sources are reliable, he did not use any blogs which is a good thing.

ORGANIZATION

- Jawad added a new subsection on decision-making called The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Decision Making.

- he added different subsections in each part, which made it easy to follow his flow of ideas and specifically what topic he was talking about.

- Missing comma in lists, e.g., "ethics and empathy."

- Hyphenation inconsistency: "real world incidents" should be "real-world incidents."

IMAGES AND MEDIA

- Jawad didn’t use any images or media.

OVERALL REVIEW

'''Overall i think Jawad did an excellent job. I think that choosing a topic of AI will always be relevant because in today’s world, AI is developing extremely fast and so it is important to cover all the avenues it’s affecting. One thing that he can improve on is using words that may not have a specific connotation in order to avoid people with prejudices who will interpret his text in the wrong way.'''