User:JayKassis/Wooclap/Francessus Peer Review

Whose work are you reviewing?

JayKassis

Link to draft you're reviewing

User:JayKassis/Wooclap

Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes

Organization: the proposed organization pattern seems typical for the content. The lead paragraph could be developed more to perhaps allow for comparison to other similar products and a more neutral treatment of features and use. The lead could also introduce more of the content to be included under the subheadings. As well, under "Description" there is information about the founders which would be better classified under "History". There are minor grammatical errors. The use of 2-letter acronyms for languages seems more suited to financial or geopolitical content. It would be better to write them out. There are bolded words which indicate significance, but it is not clear what that is. It would be useful to have some more hyperlinks. As well as links to more articles to make the content more discoverable.

Images and Media: the content lends itself to the use of more media, particularly any product launch images, or images of the creators and CEO.

Overall impression: The article appears incomplete. The question of notability does arise as there may not be sufficient sources independent of the subject. Sources do not meet assignment criteria of number, journal articles and book chapters.