User:JayRel23/Evaluate an Article

User:JayRel23/Evaluate an Article

Tetrapod
(Provide a link to the article here.)

I was interested in the evolution of tetrapod.
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

The introductory sentence was concise and gave be a brief understanding of what the article is about. The article has very detailed explanations about tetrapod. It addressed all of my questions and inquiries about tetrapod. It provided straight facts and a neutral point of view about tetrapod. The sources the article provided may not be reliable, but had plenty of information just in case something wasn't understood. I did have a difficult time reading the article, because there were so many links, but it was well organized and concise. Including the images of different tetrapod made the article less difficult to read and enhanced the article understanding itself. Overall, it provided a good source of the evolution of tetrapod.

(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)