User:Jayjaywink/Jean-Michel Frank/Almondblossoms1890 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

JayjayWink


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jayjaywink/Jean-Michel Frank


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Jean-Michel Frank

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: Lead is strong, contains relevant information and gives reader a general impression of what the rest of the article will discuss. But looks to be unchanged from current article.

Content: Content is relevant and seems to be up to date. Some other articles discussing the careers and lives of designers also include a section on their personal life. If the information is available from a reputable, peer reviewed source, it could be worth including to help represent who the designer was as a person, not just as a contributor to the world of design. Not strictly necessary; but informative and welcome when included.

Tone and Balance: Tone is neutral and balanced throughout. Does not lead the reader to feel any specific way about any of the information presented in the article.

Organization: Organizational, formatting and grammatical changes from the live article improve the overall flow and make it easier for the reader to understand and read.

Sources: Sources are varied and authors represent a range of voices on the subject. Links worked at the time of this peer review.

Images/Media: Would consider adding any images not protected by copyright; would add depth to the article to be able to see some of Jean-Michel Frank's work or the designer himself.

Overall Impressions: Though there seems to be minor changes from the article that is currently live on wikipedia, I can see that the changes made improve the overall flow and provide some clarify to the article. Overall, it's thorough and well written.