User:JaysenC/International school/Angelita Cecilia Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

JaysenC


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:JaysenC/International school - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * International school - Wikipedia
 * International school - Wikipedia

Lead[edit]
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes, it has been updated to add more and replace unnecessary content by my peer.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, my peer had added more detailed information and removed unnecessary information.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, it has included a brief description of the article's major sections.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes, my peer had provided more information that is not present in the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is concise.

Content[edit]
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, the content is relevant to the topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, the content added is up to date.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No, but I think my peer could provide more information regarding the international school's background history, such as who founded the first international school.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes, I think it deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance[edit]
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, the content added is neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, the content does not appear heavily biased toward a specific position.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? I think no.

Sources and References[edit]
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? I am not sure about that.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? Yes, the content accurately reflects what the coted sources say.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Maybe.
 * Are the sources current? Yes.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes.
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? Maybe, there is better sources available. You could provide or looks for more information regarding the background history.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, it works.

Organization[edit]
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, it's well written and easy to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? There is some grammatical error but not really much.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, the content added looks organized.

Images and Media[edit]
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes, the images have provided from the previous article.
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes.

Overall Impressions[edit][edit]

 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article (is the article more complete?) Yes, the content has improved compared to the previous article.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Informative.
 * How can the content added be improved? I think he can put some more information regarding the background history of the international school such as who founded the first international school.