User:JazChapman/Malachite/Tamara Omar Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

JazChapman


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:JazChapman/Malachite


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Malachite

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

There is no lead since this is just a part of the article.

Content

The content added is relevant to the topic and is also up to date. There is not any content that does not belong but I think some information might be missing. More information about the chemistry can be talked about. The article does not deal with any of wikipedia's equity gaps and it does not address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics.

Tone and balance

The content added is very neutral and there are no claims that are heavily biased towards any particular position. Some view points are a little underrepresented, I think you can elaborate more and make this chemistry section be more detailed. The information does not persuade the reader in favour of one position or away from another. It is neutral and factual.

Sources and references

Content is backed up by reliable secondary sources of information. I think you should cite the two reactions in the middle, put either [1] or [2] wherever they apply. The content mostly reflects the sources. The sources are thorough and current. The sources are written by a diverse spectrum of authors. All the links work.

https://www.mindat.org/min-2550.html

https://geologyscience.com/minerals/malachite/

I think these two websites can help you out with more information.

Organization

The content added is well written, clear, easy to read, and concise. No spelling or grammatical errors can be seen. Content is well organized and broken down.

Images and media

There are no images.

Talk page

Most of the things on the talk page have been already changed/ discussed. Something that has not been yet discussed in the article is rumours about malachite being toxic, this should be discussed further. I think a section about health and environmental impacts is missing from this article, that should be discussed in the talk page as well.

Overall impressions

The content added has improved the overall quality of the article making it more complete since it was missing a chemistry section. The strengths of the content added is the information being very accurate and easy to understand. The content added can be improved by finding more information about the chemistry and also adding more about the mineralogy of malachite as well as a section talking about health and environmental impacts. Maybe for some of the big words that most people wont understand you should explain the words within the text (for example hydrometallurgical).

Hope this helps!