User:JazmineQuintana/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Women in science

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose to evaluate this article simply because this topic is of interest to me. I enjoy learning about the women in science that are not as talked about today.

Lead Section

 * The lead does include an introductory sentence that explicitly describes the topic of the article however, the article does not contain a description of the article's main sections.
 * Does not include information that is not present in the article.

Content

 * Content is up to date, relevant to the topic, and article explains the underrepresented women in science.

Tone and Balance

 * Article is neutral, no biased information/opinions.
 * Article does not try to persuade reader to agree with one standpoint/side, stays fairly neutral.

Sources and References

 * Most of the sources used are reliable however a few sources are from non-peer reviewed sources.
 * Sources do reflect what is being explained in the article, they are relevant.

Organization and writing quality

 * The article contains a few grammar errors that make it difficult to understand in some places.
 * Article includes different sections instead of just having all of the information in one section.

Images and Media

 * Article includes images that pertain and are relevant towards the subjects being talked about.
 * Images are well-captioned.
 * Images are organized and eye-catching.

Talk Page Discussion

 * Most conversations consist of suggestions for improving the article.
 * There are questions being asked on topics that were not explained in the article.

Overall Impression

 * I think this article was well-rounded in grammar, relevance, and organization, however, there are a few things that can be improved. For example, the introduction section has a few grammatical errors that disallow the information to be clear and concise to the reader. It would be interesting to see a more recent section regarding women in science regionally today because there is a section in the article titled the "Regional trends as of 2013" but it is becoming a bit outdated.