User:JazzyLinx/Ruth Leonela Buentello/Vega93x Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

JazzyLinx


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JazzyLinx/Ruth_Leonela_Buentello?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hi JazzyLinx! Here's my peer review for you:

Lead

 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? - Yes, you included a clear and concise lead. Perhaps you could improve it even more by being a little bit more specific about some of the main themes in Buentello's art. To make the wording even clearer, you might consider changing "her incorporation of her personal Chicano/a culture..." to "incorporating her Chicano/a culture."

Content

 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? - Yes, all the content you've assembled here is relevant to the topic and gives readers a clear idea of what the topic is about. Good job!
 * Is the content added up-to-date? - Yes, it does seem that all of the content is sourced from recent, reliable sources. However, in some cases I had trouble finding the year for the source. You might try double-checking all the citations to make sure the date of publication is clearly listed in the same place.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? - I did not see any content that seemed irrelevant, distracting or off-topic. Most of the content provided is great, and gives useful details about the topic. If you included just a little more information about the artist's work, how it's been received by critics, or what themes it engages with, this article would be even better!
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? - Yes, this article addresses Wikipedia's equity gaps by discussing a historically underrepresented population, as its subject is a female Mexican American print artist.

Tone and Balance

 * Is the content added neutral? - Yes, the tone is consistently neutral throughout. Nice work keeping the tone informative and avoiding any perceived bias!

Sources and References

 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - Yes, and the citations were clear and easy to follow. But the article could possibly use a few additional sources to make sure readers feel comfortable that they are getting a full picture of the topic.
 * Are the sources current? - Yes, all of the sources were published within the last ten years. When I clicked on a few links, they all worked. Well done!

Organization

 * Is the content added well-written? - Yes, overall this is a well-written article. It is concise, easy to read, and provides relevant information that will be useful to readers seeking to know more about the topic. Nice job!
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? - There might be just a few minor errors, but they do not distract from the reader's understanding of the topic. Instead of "inspired by their intersectionality" I believe it should simply be "inspired by intersectionality" and near the end of the Biography section, the word " artists' " in "further the artist' [sic] drive" is missing an "s."
 * Is the content added well-organized? - Yes, you followed the Wikipedia template accurately and provided a clear, organized set of headings to guide the reader through the content.

Overall impressions

 * What are the strengths of the content added? - Overall, this is a clear, concise article that provides a good summary of the relevant information on the topic. The sources are up-to-date and accurately communicate the information linked with them in the citations. There do not seem to be any major omissions, and the tone is neutral and informative throughout.
 * How can the content added be improved? - While the existing content is relevant and easy to read, it could be improved even more by adding some additional details about the nature of the artist's work. Other than that, this is a really well-written Wikipedia article!