User:Jbains03/Domestic violence in the United States/801johnna Peer Review

Overall Impression:

General info
Jbains03
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jbains03/Domestic violence in the United States:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Domestic violence in the United States:

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

The lead has been updated and reflects current status of law. It is written with clarity and concisely describes the article's topic. You've chosen a very robust article. Not sure you need to address all major sections. I think because you are editing a subsection of a main heading, you probably want to stick to law. You could provide some statistical info re: as the law applies, law on the books versus what that looks like in action. Do the victims have to face their aggressors in court experiencing the trauma, lived experiences all over again? Justice aspect? Socio-economic/dependency court consequences of either staying in or leaving these situations. *Just brainstorming ideas.*--since you have chosen to focus on the Law heading.

Content: Content is up-to-date and relevant to the topic. Content could include the impacts of these law on the survivors if you have research on that. Historical content is easy to follow and well written.

Tone & Balance: The tone and balance are neutral and reflective of current laws and their intentions and implications.

Sources and References: Sources look like they are original text sources.

Organization: Your drafted contributions are well organized and clearly written. I think "primarily" should be "primary"--but double-check.

Images and Media: N/A

Overall Impression: Incomplete. Can better review when additional contributions are made.