User:Jbennett45/sandbox

Evaluation of the article for Possession
The article for Possession does a good job of detailing the physical information about the novel and the author's inspiration for the the novel. The summary of the novel, however, applies too much interpretive bias to be considered solely a summary. Specifically, for example, the final sentence: "In a brief epilogue, it is revealed that both the modern and historical characters (and hence the reader), have for much of the latter half of the book, misunderstood the significance of one of Ash's key mementoes." The significance of the epilogue could be in another interpretation, that no one knew the identity of LaMotte's child because she--the daughter--forgot to deliver the message about having met Ash. The reader is left to think that LaMotte's child was left in Brittany, instead of having been raised in England by the Baileys. It also ignores the depth of the parallelism between Ash and LaMotte and Michell and Bailey. It is a complex and well constructed arc and is required for complete understanding of the plot. A portion of the book which takes place in Brittany, detailing a brooch, is left out of the plot summary but forms a piece of the puzzle as it were to discovering the entire nature of LaMotte and Ash's relationship.

Individual implementation plan
As a part of the group concerned with design and citation, I will be chiefly cross-checking the groups when they place citations into the newly generated content. Content lacking a citation that would otherwise require one will be tagged, and the group notified. As the one member of the class who read the early form of the play, I will also be generating some content in order to recognize those differences between the early and the later form when necessary.