User:Jbrtn44/Horizontal gaze palsy/Aksajikian Peer Review

General info
Jbrtn44
 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * 1) First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?
 * 2) * The article is very well organized. I loved the use of subheaders!
 * 3) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?
 * 4) * The neurologic pathways that control horizontal gaze is extremely complex. I would suggest adding a picture so that the reader would better understand how everything is wired. Also, although this topic is complex and is very hard to describe in lay terminology, I would suggest switching some of the abbriviations (like MLF) or when you insert the photo, to refer to it.
 * 5) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * 6) * Adjustuing the termonology a bit so that it would be readable by a high school student. Overall, exccellent work!
 * 7) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!
 * 8) * I liked the organization of the article. I was debating on using subheaders in mine, and now after seeing this, I will definetly implement that in my sandbox!