User:Jc4387/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
2 Broke Girls

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
As I was looking over all of the articles to edit in the C-class articles, I clicked on the topic of New York City and saw that the television show, 2 Broke Girls, was one of the first ones on the list and since I have watched the show before, I thought it would be interesting to read what the article has written about the show. My preliminary impression was that the article does seem to cover a lot on the series and actors. The information included ranges from the summary to the cast and special guests to the awards and nominations of the the actors.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)


 * The lead does include an introductory sentence that successfully explains the article's topics. The brief description of the major sections can be found on the second paragraph. With the concise lead presented, it does not present any information that is not included on the article.
 * The article content is very relevant to the topic as I have said and it provides a range of information. The content is up to date because the series has already ended and the article does provide the information up until that point. In addition to that, the page was lasted edited this morning. There are no information on the article that should not be present. No, the article does not deal with any equity gaps.
 * The article is indeed neutral, it does not give any information that sounds bias to the audience. The information given are simply facts that were found from different sources.
 * The fact are backed up by the sources listed at the bottom. The sources themselves are thorough, up to date and are written by diverse spectrum of authors. There are not better sources for this topic as it is not something that would need to be peer edited; this specific topic would not be showing up on academic databases. The links do work properly.
 * The article is easy to read and well-organized, and as far as I can tell, there are no grammatical errors.
 * Two images are included in this article and they are captioned. These images do adhere to the copyright regulations. Also, they are laid out in a way that it is visually appalling for readers to view.
 * There were a couple of individuals that were discussing about how one of the main characters in the series is representing Paris Hilton. Another person has asked why a specific subtopic was not included in this article. This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: Television, Comedy, United Stated/American Television, and New York City.
 * Overall, this article provides enough information for those who may not have any idea about the series. The strengths of the article is its ability to clearly state all of the main and supporting characters and also the the special guest stars. In addition, this article contains a ton of references for an article that does not even seem to be so long. This article could be improved in a way that it adds the subtopics of what some people has discussed about in the Talk page. Lastly, this article has been developed pretty well, aside from some information that readers want included.