User:Jckilpinen/Tuscarora War/Connormccutcheon Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) jckilpinen
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Jckilpinen/Tuscarora War

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes. I agree with the decision to keep the start the of the article with the topic "History" This allows the reader to get a sense of the Tuscarora before diving into harder topics. By adding "aftermath", this helps the article too.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The contents section is concise and gives an accurate view of what the article has in it.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes there was added information about the history that would not normally been included if it was just about the Tuscarora War. There's information about the tribe and not just the war. Information about the aftermath which was needed.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes references were recent
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? All the content that is there definitely belongs there. But maybe you can add more to the beginning of the Tuscarora War. There is information about the history but maybe add something that pertains to right before the conflict erupted such as that the colonists were Swiss.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No it stays very informative and remains neutral.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No equally showing tribe and colonists point of view
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No very informative

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes they are not just from regular websites.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes everything down to the references.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes very concise. This is the reason i believe more could be added about the beginning because the rest is very informative and thought out.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes it makes it easy to read because of history and an added portion about Chief Blount. Wikipedia did not have information on him which makes it a good add for this article. By adding an Aftermath section this helps the organization and makes the article flow better.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?