User:Jcleophat/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

 * Human Genetics Commission: (Human Genetics Commission)
 * This article was chosen for evaluation because it is within the scope of ethics and genetics. However, after skimming through the article, not a lot of information was given about the Human Genetics Commission (HGC) and some of the references provided in this article are unreliable. There can be many improvements made in this article.

Lead evaluation


 * The Lead includes a short "definition" that loosely describes what the HGC was, where they were located, and the topics that were covered under the commission. Also, the Lead includes some of the members within it.
 * The Lead does not include a description of the article's major sections.
 * The Lead is concise.

Content evaluation


 * The article contain information that is relevant to the topic and is up-to-date. There are a lot of content that is missing in this article. There are facts given but not a decent amount of details to elaborate the facts.

Tone and balance evaluation


 * The article is neutral and fact based. Also, there is no bias in this article and its viewpoints are very underrepresented.

Sources and references evaluation


 * The facts in the article are backed up by sources that are unreliable. One of the sources is the HGC website and another source does not work. However, the other sources that do work looks like a blog post.
 * The sources are not current and one of them does not work.

Organization evaluation


 * The article is concise and easy to read. However, there's not enough information or content for there to be a real organization.

Images and media evaluation


 * This article does not include any images.

Talk page evaluation


 * In the talk page, only one person wrote on the modification of an external link.
 * This article is rated as a Stub-class with low importance. There are 5 WikiProjects that this article is a part of: Politics of the United Kingdom, Genetics, Medicine, Human Genetic History, and Philosophy.

Overall evaluation


 * The article does not have many strengths and can use a lot of improvements. One thing that can improve are the sources used. It can also improve by having sections to talk more about HGC and why it ended.
 * This article is poorly developed and needs more information about the topic overall.