User:Jcody4/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Architectural analytics

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article due to the lack of information. There are no sources, and there are no external references.

Evaluate the article
The Lead section of the article does clearly identify the topic. It provides useful information in regards to the topic, however there is no other information in the article, so this lead section is all the viewer will see.

This article was last updated in February of 2019, so it is not updated with current information. The content is relevant to the article, but it is lacking in a deeper study. There is minimal background or history of this topic.

This is a completely neutral article. The author shows no social or political bias in their writing. The reader is free to have their own opinions about the article. Unfortunately, there is no over/under representation of anyone, as there is no representation in general.

This article has no sources or references, so the legitimacy of its information is in question. The use of a reliable source would have been very useful to the author.The article is organized well. It leads off with the topic, then a definition, then a slightly deeper clarification on the definition. This article could contain way more information, as there is no historical context, relevancy to modern society, or examples of the topic. There are also no images provided, leaving this article bare and mildly unappealing.

Overall, this article is bland. It would have a very low rating. The article is missing sources, deeper information, images, and is out of date. This would provide little information to anyone accessing the page. Its only strengths would be the relevancy to the topic, as none of the information given is unnecessary. It could be improved by recent facts being added and by adding sources to the article.