User:Jcody4/Fernando Donis/J119M Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jcody4


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jcody4/Fernando Donis


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Fernando Donis

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

 * Yes
 * Yes
 * Yes
 * No
 * Concise

Content

 * Yes
 * Yes
 * I don't think so.
 * No

Tone and Balance

 * Yes
 * No
 * No
 * No, it is neutral and well written.

Sources and References

 * Yes
 * Yes
 * Yes
 * Yes
 * Yes
 * I don't think so, the sources are good.
 * Yes

Organization

 * Yes
 * None that I found.
 * Yes, I think the sections reflect the major points.

Images and Media

 * Yes
 * No, that is something that could be added.
 * I think so.
 * Yes

Overall Impressions

 * Yes, the added content has improved the article.
 * The added content has sources to back it up and is organized quite well.
 * I can't think of any suggestions.