User:JdanR/Agonist/J dotter Peer Review

Your sources look really great, a couple of them are primary sources, which I know we were supposed to avoid, but they look sound enough to still be worth mentioning in your article.

I love how you talk about each of the different types of interactions (make sure that it is brief so that it has good balance) and then link to those pages. That is really smart.

You mentioned this, but I just want to reiterate that you should be careful about the medical advice thing. That is definitely an area where things could get dicey.

If you want me too look at it after you have things written out feel free to send me a message!

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)