User:Jdgoffard/Hemisquilla californiensis/Xinyuy22 Peer Review

General info
Jdgoffard
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jdgoffard/Hemisquilla californiensis
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Hemisquilla californiensis

Lead
Julia kept the lead from the original article. And I believe it would be better if the lead could include some brief descriptions of the major sections -- for instance, maybe a sentence about the important taxonomic structure, 2-3 sentences about Hemisquilla californiensis's preference of habitation.

Content
Julia added content about the taxonomic characteristics, habitat, and captivity of Hemisquilla californiensis. The information is relevant and up-to-date. It definitely makes the article more readable by providing the important physical features of the shrimps and addressing topics that lack attention.

Tone and Balance
The content added is neutral and non-biased. Rather than the viewpoints, almost all of the paragraphs added try to present the facts. Hence, It does not contain the problem of being underrepresented or overrepresented.

Sources and References
The new content is indeed backed up by reliable sources of information, published journals, or some organization websites.

Organization
The contents added are well-organized and easy to read.

Images and Media
No new images and media wereadded.

Overall Impression
My overall impression is Julia's edits would be very helpful for readers who want to distinguish the specific species by providing information about Hemisquilla californiensis 's large-scale distribution with small-scale habitat features as well as its appearance. I believe the article could be further improved by some media or images that help readers get a quick and direct overview of what Hemisquilla californiensis looks like.