User:Jdogzz/sandbox

Chosen topic: Cell-free System

Questions:

'''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?'''

The focus does seem to be the primary topic, though it was distracting to see more on its advantages than what it is.

'''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?'''

It appears to be biased towards the understanding that the topic is purely advantageous.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

It does not appear to offer any points showing disadvantages of the topic.

'''Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?'''

The links work, and the sources appear to be correctly included in the article.

'''Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?'''

The followup facts are mostly supported, though the opening comments are not. The information comes from a variety of research publications. Two of the articles include conflict of interest statements regarding patents.

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?'''

I am not able to comment on the current state of the field. It appears there is more that could be added as the article is a stub, but the field is apparently well-known for decades.

'''Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?'''

There is a brief comment on potential mergings with another article.

'''How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?'''

There is no rating as the article is a stub. It is within the scope of the WikiProject of Molecular and Cell Biology.

How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

I do not believe this topic has yet to be discussed in class.