User:Jdtton/sandbox


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Everything in the article appears to be relevant to the topic. Nothing was really distracting to me.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * the article appears to be neutral and nothing stood out to me as being heavily biased.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * It doesn't look like there is much information about the symptoms of the London flu or anything telling what it is other than just a form of influenza.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The links that I checked work and appear to support the claims in the article.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * The facts seem to be referenced with appropriate sources. Some of the sources may be somewhat biased but not heavily biased.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Symptoms are missing and could be added to the page.
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There are no conversations on the talk page.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * It is rated start class mid importance. It is part of 4 projects (viruses, London, India, and medicine/pulmonary).
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Early life[edit][edit source]
Born in Paris on 15 May 1859, Pierre Curie was the son of Eugène Curie (28 August 1827 – 25 February 1910), a doctor of French Huguenot Protestant origin from Alsace, and Sophie-Claire Depouilly Curie (15 January 1832 – 27 September 1897). He was educated by his father and in his early teens showed a strong aptitude for mathematics and geometry. When he was 16, he earned his math degree.[clarification needed] By the age of 18, he earned a higher degree from the Faculty of Sciences at the Sorbonne.Jdtton (talk) 01:47, 17 October 2020 (UTC)  He did not proceed immediately to a doctorate due to lack of money. Instead, he worked as a laboratory instructor. When Pierre Curie was preparing for his Bachelor of Science degree, he worked in the laboratory of Jean-Gustave Bourbouze in the Faculty of Science. In 1895, he went on to receive his doctorate at the University of Paris, in France. After obtaining his doctorate, he became professor of physics and in 1900, he became professor in the faculty of sciences.

Death[edit source]
Pierre Curie died in a street accident in Paris on 19 April 1906. Crossing the busy Rue Dauphine in the rain at the Quai de Conti, he slipped and fell under a heavy horse-drawn cart. He died instantly when one of the wheels ran over his head, fracturing his skull. Statements made by his father and lab assistant imply that Curie's characteristic absent-minded preoccupation with his thoughts contributed to his death.

Both the Curies experienced radium burns, both accidentally and voluntarily, and were exposed to extensive doses of radiation while conducting their research. They experienced radiation sickness and Marie Curie died of aplastic anemia in 1934. Even now, all their papers from the 1890s, even her cookbooks, are too dangerous to touch. Their laboratory books are kept in special lead boxes and people who want to see them have to wear protective clothing. Most of which can be found at Bibliothèque nationale de France. Had Pierre Curie not been killed as he was, it is likely that he would have eventually died of the effects of radiation, as did his wife, their daughter Irène, and her husband Frédéric Joliot.

In April 1995, Pierre and Marie Curie were moved from their original resting place, a family cemetery, and enshrined in the crypt of the Panthéon in Paris.


 * 1) ^
 * 2) ^

Review by Scmnr8
This all looks really good! Specifically in the Early Life section, I would like to see a little bit more about his education before the age of 16. Maybe if there were more about his father's background, and just a few more details that would be awesome. The Death section also looks really good. It might be a good idea to add some more references to both sections, just to be clear where the information is coming from. I also like how you have a lot of other topics linked in the text. I don't know if you've looked into changing this yet or if you have plans to, but the lead section in the article could use a lot more information. Some of what is in this sandbox is directly from the article with small edits. I agree it could use some more information in the early life and will look into what I can find there. I will also work on adding more references to both sections. Additionally, I will look at the beginning of the article and see what, if anything, I can add to it. Thanks for your feedback.

Peer Review by Geh3km[edit]

 * 1) I think that the article does well in better explaining some more about Currie's schooling and some more about his accomplishments. I think adding more about the honor he was receiving for his work is something that really adds to the article. The information is not opinionated and adds good substance to the article.
 * 2) I noticed that the information in the draft for peer section went out of chronological order. I think that the information is good, but I think a little more organization will make it even better. The organization would help make the changes clearer.
 * 3) The article could be improved by reorganizing the information and putting what exactly is from the original source and what is new information to the article. Also, if the information has the section that it will be added to, that would help the clarity. Also, if you elaborated more on Lord Kelvin and the impact he had on the situation, it could help clarify who he is or how important he is.

Thanks for the feedback about the schooling and accomplishments. I agree that that part is looking pretty good at this point.

I will try to organize the information a bit better in that section although that is not the main section we are working in so it is not the highest priority currently.

I agree that reorganizing the information would be beneficial and I will try to make it more clear what is new or old information. I may use the draft for peer section to make it clear what the new information is. I will also try to find some extra information about Lord Kelvin to clarify that part.