User:Jellocoup/Lissa Yellowbird-Chase/Smi02002 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jellocoup, PaisleySierra, and Krogm029


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Lissa Yellowbird-Chase


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * not available

Lead
The lead has been added and includes a nice and quick introduction to Lissa Yellowbird-Chase with what she does and who she is. The lead includes a brief mention of both the major topics of the article as well as the overall topic. The lead is short and concise but does not include any extra information not found in the article.

Content
The content that has been added is all relevant to the topic, up to date and belongs within the article. This article does fall under the equity gap on Wikipedia and addresses underrepresented people.

Tone and Balance
The content written is neutral without any heavy bias towards anything and does not try to persuade the reader towards any decision but sticks to informing about the subject. There is a heavy amount of content under the Notable Cases section, making the Life section seem rather short.

Sources and References
All sources are from second hand sources, however I am unsure about facebook being considered reliable. One of the links are broken so I can not check to see if the information is accurate, however the other sources seem to include the information that was used for the wikipedia article. Most of the sources appear to be news articles that were written recently.

Organization
The article is well organized and flows nicely from topic to topic. There don't appear to be any major grammar or spelling issues.

Images and Media
The image feels off putting in the article. The placement is rather small and difficult to see and doesn't seem to relate to anything written in the text.

For New Articles Only
The article has a good list of sources and follows a good template for a wikipedia article with the headings and flow of the article. The article appears to link to several other articles that would allow it to be more discoverable.

Overall Impressions
I think this article is written really well. There does not seem to be any bias and is informational on a topic with solid sources that support. The only things that need to be changed is I would instead of having the picture of the map but a picture of Lissa Yellowbird-Chase as this is a biography.