User:JellyfishFan/Automated synthesis/Gracelyn099 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

MeganMezera, Kyraa.lien,  JellyfishFan


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JellyfishFan/Automated_synthesis?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Automated synthesis

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

-Gives a good definition right off the bat which is helpful.

-Giving benefits off the bat is also great as it kind of defined your scope.

-Overall the lead is good. A goos summary is given and is in logical order.

Content

-Overall there is a very thorough attempt at adding new and improved information.

-The content is all relevant.

-minor but Looks as though another round of editing for grammatical mistakes would be helpful. A few sentences that are run-on like and a few words spelt wrong.

-I feel like maybe more information on the first application paragraph may be helpful. Maybe you could explain more about previous versus new uses.

Tone and balance

-Yes all is neutral. I do not see any personal opinions influencing the edits. All are cited too.

Images:

-I think you would benefit from adding more visuals.

-For the benefits maybe add real photo's of the used of your synthesis.

Sources:

-All sources looked good from what I saw

-All look to be very reliable and you used multiple sources which is good.

Impressions

-overall I see a good effort and a lot added.

-I do not really have much to add as you did well and really went through it.