User:JellyfishFan/Automated synthesis/MD092022 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

JellyfishFan, Kyraa.lien, MeganMezera


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JellyfishFan/Automated_synthesis?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Automated Synthesis

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Overall, the additions made to the article are very thorough and well thought out. The sheer amount of information added and number of new citations has really helped to strengthen and make the article more complete. Further, most of the text that was added is well written and grammatically correct, however, there are a few sentences that I feel could be rearranged to make them flow better. One of the only critiques I can make is that in the lead multiple applications of automated synthesis are mentioned but in the body almost all of the focus is on polymers so I feel some more emphasis could be put on the other applications such as personal care and radiosynthesis. The only other recommendation I have would be to do a quick read through of the entire draft again just to catch any small errors like typos or missed punctuation (there is a typo in the image added comparing automatic vs manual synthesis).