User:JellyfishFan/Automated synthesis/Thejigglyjello Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

JellyfishFan, Kyraa.lien, MeganMezera


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JellyfishFan/Automated_synthesis?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Automated synthesis

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

Lead has been changed reasonably to provide more context on the topic. Excellent work in keeping it concise and not overly detailed.

Content

The content is relevant to the topic and is all up to date.

Tone and Balance

The claims made in the article are neutral and take a very non-biased point of view.

Sources and References

Impressive amount of references and sources! All seem relevant to the topic while not infringing on any copyright issues. The sources seem to come from a variety of well trusted references.

Organization

Content is organized into clear and intuitive sections which make it easy for readers to navigate around.

Images and Media

Images are properly captioned. Would suggest if possible, making the images slightly bigger as they are a bit small.

Overall impressions

New additions have definitely added value to the article in terms of content and organization, good job!