User:Jelopple/John Jea/Bakedbread00 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jelopple


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jelopple/John_Jea?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * John Jea

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead - Although the lead is short, I think it introduces the topic well. It is concise and includes the contents that will be discussed within the article.

Content- The content added is thorough and relevant to the topic. It is up-to-date and adds important information that gives better insight into who John Jea was.

Tone and Balance - The content is added in a neutral tone and there is no heavy bias. Although the information is from a couple of sources, no viewpoint seems to be over or under represented.

Sources and References - The sources are reliable, since a lot of the information comes from the subject himself. The sources are also properly formatted and I can find them when I look it up myself. The information added is relevant and trustworthy.

Organization - The article is very well organized and easy to read. The information flows well and nothing seems out of place. There are no grammatical or spelling errors.

Images and Media - There is an image of the subject that adheres to Wikipedia guidelines.

Overall impressions -

I think the edits made to this article are excellent. The content is very thorough and is relevant to the topic. The edits made are clear and concise, making the article easy to read and understand. The organization is well done and also adds to the readability of the article. Overall, the contributions you've made have made the Wikipedia world a better place!