User:Jemeyoutoo

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Apatnosh. Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC) == Cumulative wind capacity in 2019, Spain (2019) == Although the installed power is fairly correct (25,224 MW), the percentage representing the total amount cumulative installed is around 24%, not the 3.9% as written. {cite web |url=https://www.ree.es/es/datos/generacion/potencia-instalada} Figuerai (talk) 13:30, 30 September 2021 (UTC) :That percentage refers to the share of the total wind power installed capacity in the world. --Ita140188 (talk) 00:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC)   == habitat loss in lead ==  Should we remove ", which can lead to "industrialization of the countryside"[5] and habitat loss.[4]" from the lead because:  1) Most new European wind power is far offshore I think - cite 5 seems re Europe mainly  2) Offshore windpower creates habitat with foundations as far as I know. So there ought to be studies cited in the body text estimating whether there is a net loss or gain of habitat I think. After that it could be summarized in the lead if significant Chidgk1 (talk) 18:39, 16 November 2021 (UTC)   OK I accept your point that the sentence refers to onshore. But is habitat loss significant compared to other causes of habitat loss? Chidgk1 (talk) 11:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC) By all means, delete any reference to blatant existing & future ruination of scenery, both inland and looking out from ocean shores (30+ mile visibility offsets are often impractical). It's all about selling these huge machines as "green" when they're clearly industrial & invasive. Wind turbines also show no real evidence of flattening the global CO2 curve (fossil fuels build them, plus Jevons paradox when people think they can waste "clean" electricity). https://falseprogress.home.blog/2016/08/29/wind-turbines-desecrate-nature/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.25.214.24 (talk) 00:18, 12 January 2022 (UTC)   == It's fair to say, they can cause premature death in PEOPLE. == At least these GIANT turbines! Should as this is the case here NOT AND NEVER combined with: * strict military grade RF devices of any kind and design * MASERs (microwaves-operated LASERs, as a LASER uses light, a MASER uses microwaves/RF!) * Smart meters * illegal antenna setups of any kind If else wind power usage causes premature death in people, I do not know! But the 5G in Gateshead was ENSURED to cause it. Reasons why: * illegal antenna designs for LED street lights 5G (maybe not the rest?!) * 450 Nanometers frequency in use in the lamp light part (this frequency can cause eye cancer in people! and prostate cancer in the males!) --2001:9E8:1211:E100:BCF8:8137:B478:513E (talk) 13:57, 12 May 2022 (U