User:Jemileevanzandt

Jemileevanzandt (talk) 16:32, 30 April 2012 (UTC) 4/30/2012 Isn't calling CSS: Cascading Style Sheets redundant when we say CSS Cascading Style Sheets? This article uses the acronym with its meaning in sequential order in a redundant fashion, doesn't it? I am wondering why? My query is: shouldn't this be corrected to read only CSS once the antecedent is identified and recognized the first time? Thank you.