User:Jencastiel/Chlorophenol red/Thomasgraziadio Peer Review

Lead:

The lead talks about what Chlorophenol red is, however they use a comparison to something that most people reading it wouldn't know. So, I think they should think about making a comparison to something more basic.

Content:

Seems very relevant, don't really have anything else to base it off of however the information provided gave me some understanding.

Tone and Balance:

The content is mostly just stating facts about the topic, so there really isn't any room for bias. Definitely a neutral tone.

Sources:

The sources seem very specific to what they were talking about in their writing. Two of them are fairly recent and one is older from the 90's.

Organization:

Overall the organization is fine, like I stated before I'd try to use a more broader topic to help people understand what the article is trying to talk about. Also there is a typo in this sentence "...chromogenic label and has can undergo oxidation..."

Images and media:

No images or media were added.

Overall impression:

Added better in-depth definition about the topic. Was very informative, and added real life examples.

Thank you for the feedback!

My list of changes:

-Adding information about pH definition (expanding on a broad topic to help understanding

-Fixing typo

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)