User:Jencsp/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Women's Health Action and Mobilization

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article after our conversations on reproductive justice and hysteria, and I also thought it was interesting to see if/how race, gender, and class intersect or did not intersect in the feminist philosophy and activism behind this organization. I thought that this article mattered because it referred to communal efforts and care among women. My first impression was that it was short/not as well-developed.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

I thought the lead was concise and clear, but I noticed that there was a banner asking for the verification of material. Although there were not many details, I thought that the content was fair. The article talked about the more controversial/characteristic moves behind WHAM!, and the tone was neutral. There were some words, like "disrupting" that made me a little unsure, but it was generally neutral. All the claims appeared to be backed up with evidence, and the citations are credible given that they are from university databases. There were no images, and I wish they had included those, especially since they talked about WHAM! putting protest banners across the Statue of Liberty. There is nothing on the Talk page, but I did see that this article was part of a course. There are no WikiProjects on this, but it looks like it may appeal to those in LGBT studies, Women's History, and Religion/Interfaith. Overall, I liked that I got a quick view into WHAM!, but I wish there had been more pictures or excerpts from the interviews conducted.