User:Jenila Tamang/Antecedent (behavioral psychology)/Adiaditya7907 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jenila tamang


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jenila Tamang/Antecedent (behavioral psychology)


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Antecedent (behavioral psychology)

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * An introduction line and a concise description of the topic are included in the lead.
 * It does not have any brief discussion on the subject.
 * The article was very concise.
 * The content was relevant to the topic.
 * The information was current. with less information and no material with external information, regardless of subject.
 * The article was good with no under or over presentation.
 * They are current courses and they dont affect the literature of the topic.
 * All the links are working.
 * The article is straightforward and easy to read.
 * There are no grammatical errors.
 * It's well-organized; they didn't divide it into sections based on important issues.
 * No images are provided or posted in the article.